[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230223093243.1180-8-jgross@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:32:38 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/12] x86/mtrr: allocate mtrr_value array dynamically
The mtrr_value[] array is a static variable, which is used only in a
few configurations. Consuming 6kB is ridiculous for this case,
especially as the array doesn't need to be that large and it can easily
be allocated dynamically.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
index 0c83990501f5..50cd2287b6e1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ struct mtrr_value {
unsigned long lsize;
};
-static struct mtrr_value mtrr_value[MTRR_MAX_VAR_RANGES];
+static struct mtrr_value *mtrr_value;
static int mtrr_save(void)
{
@@ -750,6 +750,7 @@ static int __init mtrr_init_finialize(void)
* TBD: is there any system with such CPU which supports
* suspend/resume? If no, we should remove the code.
*/
+ mtrr_value = kcalloc(num_var_ranges, sizeof(*mtrr_value), GFP_KERNEL);
register_syscore_ops(&mtrr_syscore_ops);
return 0;
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists