[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/c4G34O0B8zqobt@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:55:39 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@...cle.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Dennis Gilmore <dennis@...il.us>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 v2 0/5] Fix Build ID on arm64 if CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 01:18:39PM -0700, Tom Saeger wrote:
> Build ID is missing for arm64 with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y using ld >= 2.36
> on 5.4, 5.10, and 5.15
>
> Backport BuildID fixes.
I do not understand why you are applying patches from 6.2 that "fix"
something that is not in this kernel (or the older ones). Please
document that really well on your next set of submissions.
I've taken the 6.1.y series only and dropped all the others.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists