[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/dK6OoNpYswIqrD@hog>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:15:52 +0100
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Cc: borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tls: fix possible info leak in
tls_set_device_offload()
2023-02-23, 17:05:08 +0800, Hangyu Hua wrote:
> After tls_set_device_offload() fails, we enter tls_set_sw_offload(). But
> tls_set_sw_offload can't set cctx->iv and cctx->rec_seq to NULL if it fails
> before kmalloc cctx->iv. This may cause info leak when we call
> do_tls_getsockopt_conf().
Is there really an issue here?
If both tls_set_device_offload and tls_set_sw_offload fail,
do_tls_setsockopt_conf will clear crypto_{send,recv} from the context.
Then the TLS_CRYPTO_INFO_READY in do_tls_getsockopt_conf will fail, so
we won't try to access iv or rec_seq.
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists