linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/vmwgfx: Work around VMW_ALLOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:50:24 +0000
From:   Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>
To:     "tangmeng@...ontech.com" <tangmeng@...ontech.com>,
        "daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux-graphics-maintainer <Linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>,
        "airlied@...il.com" <airlied@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/vmwgfx: Work around VMW_ALLOC_DMABUF

On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 15:04 +0800, Meng Tang wrote:
> A privilege escalation vulnerability was found in vmwgfx driver
> in drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c in GPU component of Linux
> kernel with device file '/dev/dri/renderD128 (or Dxxx)'. This flaw
> allows a local attacker with a user account on the system to gain
> privilege, causing a denial of service(DoS).
> 
> This vulnerability can be quickly verified by the following code
> logic:
> ...
> dri_fd = open("/dev/dri/renderD128", O_RDWR);
> ret = ioctl(dri_fd, 0xC0186441, &arg);
> if (ret == 0) {
>         printf("[*] VMW_ALLOC_DMABUF Success!\n");
> }
> ...

This is just regular usage of that ioctl. What's the vulnerability?

> 
> Submit this commit to fix it.

No, this is incorrect. You're effectively just disabling the driver for normal
apps/users using OpenGL or any accelerated contexts, which is going to completely
break, well, essentially everything this driver is for. Being able to use ioctl's
that were meant to be used is not a bug.

If you have a proof of concept or at least a description of the vulnerability that
you've found I'd be happy to take a look at it.

z