[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230223132725.11685-6-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 21:27:23 +0800
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tkhai@...ru, hannes@...xchg.org,
shakeelb@...gle.com, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, david@...hat.com, shy828301@...il.com
Cc: sultan@...neltoast.com, dave@...olabs.net,
penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp, paulmck@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: vmscan: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred
For now, reparent_shrinker_deferred() is the only holder
of read lock of shrinker_rwsem. And it already holds the
global cgroup_mutex, so it will not be called in parallel.
Therefore, in order to convert shrinker_rwsem to shrinker_mutex
later, here we change to hold the write lock of shrinker_rwsem
to reparent.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 25a4a660e45f..89602e97583a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
parent = root_mem_cgroup;
/* Prevent from concurrent shrinker_info expand */
- down_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
+ down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
for_each_node(nid) {
child_info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
parent_info = shrinker_info_protected(parent, nid);
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
atomic_long_add(nr, &parent_info->nr_deferred[i]);
}
}
- up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
+ up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
}
static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists