[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230223140710.72qcxcvyme5npf2v@ripper>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 06:07:10 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] interconnect: qcom: msm8996: Specify no bus
clock scaling on A0NoC
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 09:28:54PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 17.02.2023 21:26, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 21:53, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 17.02.2023 20:27, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 17.02.2023 11:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >>>> A0NoC only does bus scaling through RPM votes and does not have any
> >>>> ICC clocks. Describe this.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>> This is bad, as devm_clk_get_bulk{"", _optional} doesn't
> >>> check if num_clocks makes sense and passes "-1" down the
> >>> devres alloc chain..
> >>>
> >>> I'll rework this for the next revision by simply assigning
> >>> the common "bus", "bus_a" set everywhere instead of relying
> >>> on it being there by default..
> >> Or maybe I shouldn't, as that will require redefining the array
> >> over and over again.. Perhaps just passing <&xo_board>, <&xo_board>
> >> to a0noc's "bus", "bus_a", similar to what's been done on SDM630's
> >> GNoC would be less messy?
> >
> > What about simply skipping a call to devm_clk_get if num_bus_clocks is negative?
> I tested that locally before reporting the mistake on my side and
> while it works, I just consider it.. ugly, because:
>
> num_clocks =
> >0 => use the externally specified num_/clocks (logical)
> =0 => use the default 2
Why not let go of this "convenience" and have num_clocks actually mean
number of clocks?
Regards,
Bjorn
> <0 => consider there's zero
>
> ..but maybe that's just me.. if you don't find it ugly, I may just
> go with that.
>
> Konrad
> >
> >>
> >> Konrad
> >>>
> >>> Konrad
> >>>> drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c | 1 +
> >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c
> >>>> index 1a5e0ad36cc4..45eb8675fb11 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c
> >>>> @@ -1817,6 +1817,7 @@ static const struct qcom_icc_desc msm8996_a0noc = {
> >>>> .type = QCOM_ICC_NOC,
> >>>> .nodes = a0noc_nodes,
> >>>> .num_nodes = ARRAY_SIZE(a0noc_nodes),
> >>>> + .num_bus_clocks = -1, /* No bus clock scaling */
> >>>> .intf_clocks = a0noc_intf_clocks,
> >>>> .num_intf_clocks = ARRAY_SIZE(a0noc_intf_clocks),
> >>>> .has_bus_pd = true,
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists