linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86-64: Remove global variables from boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:24:33 -0500
From:   Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86-64: Remove global variables from boot

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:44 AM David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 17:12 -0500, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > This is on top of the parallel boot v10 series.
> >
> > Remove the global variables initial_gs, initial_stack, and
> > early_gdt_descr from the 64-bit boot code.  The stack, GDT, and GSBASE
> > can be determined from the CPU number.
> >
> > Brian Gerst (6):
> >   x86/smpboot: Use CPU number instead of APIC ID for single CPU startup
> >   x86/smpboot: Use current_task to get idle thread
>
>
> I think those first two should be folded into the 'x86/smpboot: Support
> parallel startup of secondary CPUs' patch rather than follow-on
> patches?

Yes, that makes sense.

> >   x86/smpboot: Remove initial_stack on 64-bit
> >   x86/smpbppt: Remove early_gdt_descr on 64-bit
> >   x86/smpboot: Remove initial_gs
> >   x86/smpboot: Simplify boot CPU setup
>
> Those four probably make sense to come separately. For each of them,
>
> Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
>
> I've pulled in the v10 series from Usama, squashed the first two as I
> suggested, added the last four on top to do some testing:
> https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/parallel-6.2-rc8-part1

Looks good.  I noticed a typo in the commit log of the last patch
(dynammically -> dynamically).  Can you fix that or should I resend?

Thanks

--
Brian Gerst