lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/eTZONJh8QdJVP8@COLIN-DESKTOP1.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 08:25:08 -0800
From:   Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To:     Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
Cc:     linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        soc@...nel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: omap: add phytec pcm-049 som
 and pcm-959 dev board

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:00:50AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 2/22/23 2:38 PM, Colin Foster wrote:
> > Add yaml documentation for TI OMAP devices for the Phytec PCM-049 SoM and
> > the Phytec PCM-959 development kit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v4
> >      * New patch, based on a WIP from Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
> > 
> > ---
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml      | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml
> 
> How will this work if I add the same file? Why not take my WIP patch, make
> the suggested changes from Rob, then have it as your first patch in this
> series?

Is your WIP intended to convert all omap.txt to ti,omap.yaml? Or chunk
off devices one at a time?

If the former, when your patch is done it should be a pretty simple
rebase conflict resolution. If the latter (which feels more digestable)
this offers that template. This was Rob's / Tony's suggestion, albeit
before you sent your patch set.


Anyway, I'm happy to do any of the following:

1. Take Andrew's patches, add these references and re-submit.
2. Keep this set as-is (with the typo fix) and when Andrew's WIP is done
   it should be an easy rebase before submission.
3. Wait for Andrew's WIP to be done, then submit with this update.


I'd like to avoid #3 because I don't know where this might fall on your
priorities list.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ