[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230223180412.wwz73bz4uezm3dzk@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:04:12 -0600
From: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@...cle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Dennis Gilmore <dennis@...il.us>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 v2 0/5] Fix Build ID on arm64 if CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:55:39AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 01:18:39PM -0700, Tom Saeger wrote:
> > Build ID is missing for arm64 with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y using ld >= 2.36
> > on 5.4, 5.10, and 5.15
> >
> > Backport BuildID fixes.
>
> I do not understand why you are applying patches from 6.2 that "fix"
> something that is not in this kernel (or the older ones). Please
> document that really well on your next set of submissions.
Build ID is missing for arm64 with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y using ld >= 2.36
That's it.
What is quirky is binutils 'ld'.
Where this can be fixed is the kernel linker script, which IS present.
Those are the patches.
>
> I've taken the 6.1.y series only and dropped all the others.
All the others is where it's really broken.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists