[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230223191249.GA14091@debian>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 20:12:52 +0100
From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
dsahern@...nel.org, alexanderduyck@...com, lixiaoyan@...gle.com,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, lucien.xin@...il.com,
ye.xingchen@....com.cn, iwienand@...hat.com, leon@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gro: optimise redundant parsing of packets
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:13 PM Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently the IPv6 extension headers are parsed twice: first in
> > ipv6_gro_receive, and then again in ipv6_gro_complete.
> >
> > By using the new ->transport_proto field, and also storing the size of the
> > network header, we can avoid parsing extension headers a second time in
> > ipv6_gro_complete (which saves multiple memory dereferences and conditional
> > checks inside ipv6_exthdrs_len for a varying amount of extension headers in IPv6
> > packets).
> >
> > The implementation had to handle both inner and outer layers in case of
> > encapsulation (as they can't use the same field).
> >
> > Performance tests for TCP stream over IPv6 with a varying amount of extension
> > headers demonstrate throughput improvement of ~0.7%.
> >
> > In addition, I fixed a potential existing problem:
> > - The call to skb_set_inner_network_header at the beginning of
> > ipv6_gro_complete calculates inner_network_header based on skb->data by
> > calling skb_set_inner_network_header, and setting it to point to the beginning
> > of the ip header.
> > - If a packet is going to be handled by BIG TCP, the following code block is
> > going to shift the packet header, and skb->data is going to be changed as
> > well.
> >
> > When the two flows are combined, inner_network_header will point to the wrong
> > place.
>
> net-next is closed.
>
> If you think a fix is needed, please send a stand-alone and minimal
> patch so that we can discuss its merit.
I'll repost when net-next will be opened again.
Thanks.
>
> Note :
>
> BIG TCP only supports native IPv6, not encapsulated traffic,
> so we should not bother with inner_network_header yet.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists