linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/2] RISC-V: enable rust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y/kldmYcl7+2FBRB@spud>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2023 21:00:38 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] RISC-V: enable rust

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 09:42:08PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 2:37 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is a somewhat blind (and maybe foolish) attempt at enabling Rust
> > for RISC-V. I've tested this on Icicle, and the modules seem to work.
> > I'd like to play around with Rust on RISC-V, but I'm not interested in
> > using downstream kernels, so figured I should try and see what's
> > missing...
> > I've tagged this as RFC in case I've missed some "WAaaaa you can't do
> > this" somewhere :)
> 
> Thanks for sending this and taking the lead on RISC-V

Meh, far from it. I'm just trying to get the ball rolling if it really
is as trivial as this seems.

> I appreciate
> you put me as the author, but in this case, it was actually Gary that
> started the RISC-V port [1], and then I sent three PRs on top later
> on.

The stuff that I have lifted here all had you as the sole author in the
"rust" branch downstream, which is why I gave you authorship. Namely:
afba78eacb9b ("rust: generate target specification files on the fly")
732b3c386328 ("rust: target: remove `cpu`")

I don't see anything from [1] in these commits, so I don't think that I
made a mistake here.

> When submitting something on behalf of somebody else, I suggest being
> very careful and ideally contacting the authors beforehand. In
> particular, if there has been any modification (including to the
> commit message), then a note should be added explaining so.

It's RFC for a reason, I've had a poor track record with off-list emails
to people that do not know me so would rather do it this way :)
Probably should have noted that I wrote the ~placeholder commit messages
though, apologies. I'll sort that out for a potential v1.

> Therefore, please double-check everybody that contributed to the lines
> you are sending (e.g. via `git-blame`) and add them as

That's what I did! Unless I missed something that was non-obvious, the
only name on the commits I lifted was you. Is there somewhere else I
should have looked for that information?

> `Co-developed-by`. Also, please add a note of what you changed/wrote
> e.g. square brackets, and `Link` tags to the original PRs/discussions.

If this goes to v1, I will note that I wrote the commit messages.

Apologies,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)