linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/2] RISC-V: enable rust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2023 22:32:04 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] RISC-V: enable rust

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 11:20:34PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:00 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:

> > That's what I did! Unless I missed something that was non-obvious, the
> > only name on the commits I lifted was you. Is there somewhere else I
> > should have looked for that information?
> 
> I would have traced the commits back a bit more. For instance, in the
> first commit you mention above, one may see the RISC-V target files
> were removed, so that means something was already there. Checking who
> added those files leads to a few commits from Gary (and one from
> Daniel).

> And then it is about making a judgement call trying to be fair :)

It was a few hours ago that I looked properly, but, IIRC, it was a
conversion from config files to code? My understanding was that
config files were not copyrightable, hence I looked only at the
authorship of the code. I'm usually on the anal side about SoB stuff,
so it is not a matter of me not bothering!

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)