linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC bootconfig] Allow forcing unconditional bootconfig processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV9jJvE2y8gY5V_CxidUikCf5515QMZHzTA3rRGEOj6=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:31:50 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        corbet@....net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, urezki@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bootconfig] Allow forcing unconditional bootconfig processing

Hi Paul,

On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 5:33 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 12:22:15AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > BTW, maybe CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED is better to select this.
> > (or at least recommend to enable this)
>
> Like this?
>
>                                                         Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit d09a1505c51a70da38b34ac38062977299aef742
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Date:   Sat Jan 7 08:09:22 2023 -0800
>
>     bootconfig: Default BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE to y if BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED
>
>     When a kernel is built with CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED=y, the intention
>     will normally be to unconditionally provide the specified kernel-boot
>     arguments to the kernel, as opposed to requiring a separately provided
>     bootconfig parameter.  Therefore, make the BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE Kconfig
>     option default to y in kernels built with CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED=y.
>
>     The old semantics may be obtained by manually overriding this default.
>
>     Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 0fb19fa0edba9..97a0f14d9020d 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1379,6 +1379,7 @@ config BOOT_CONFIG
>  config BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE
>         bool "Force unconditional bootconfig processing"
>         depends on BOOT_CONFIG
> +       default y if BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED
>         help
>           With this Kconfig option set, BOOT_CONFIG processing is carried
>           out even when the "bootconfig" kernel-boot parameter is omitted.

Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 6ded8a28ed80e4cc
("bootconfig: Default BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE to y if BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED").

After this change, an all{mod,yes}config kernel has:

    CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE=y
    CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED=y
    CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED_FILE=""

Will this actually work? I haven't tried booting such a kernel yet.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds