[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/iA/sQh/p9980qQ@mail.local>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 10:18:54 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/22] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: add nvmem-cell
offset
On 24/02/2023 09:21:07+0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 05:51:20PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 05:44:39PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > On 11/02/2023 09:22:54+0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:48:08PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > > On 02/02/2023 16:54:42+0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > > > On many Qualcomm platforms the PMIC RTC control and time registers are
> > > > > > read-only so that the RTC time can not be updated. Instead an offset
> > > > > > needs be stored in some machine-specific non-volatile memory, which a
> > > > > > driver can take into account.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add an 'offset' nvmem cell which can be used to store a 32-bit offset
> > > > > > from the Unix epoch so that the RTC time can be updated on such
> > > > > > platforms.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> >
> > > > > The patch doesn't apply because this part of the context is not
> > > > > upstream. Can you rebase?
> > > >
> > > > Ah, sorry about that. That's because of commit 51b3802e7960
> > > > ("dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: allow 'wakeup-source' property") which
> > > > is now in Linus's tree (and your rtc-fixes branch).
> > > >
> > > > Do you still want me to rebase or do you prefer to handle the conflict
> > > > some other way?
> > >
> > > Ah yes, my bad, I'll merge rtc-fixes in rtc-next before applying
> >
> > Sorry about reminding so soon, but with the merge window approaching
> > fast, will you be able to get this merged for 6.3?
>
> Looks like these last two patches adding support for the nvmem offset
> has not been applied yet. Still hoping you can get them merged for 6.3
> even if this one does not apply cleanly unless you first merge your
> rtc-fixes branch.
This is still my plan, I'm travelling right now but they will be sent for
6.3
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists