[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a47e2686-1e35-39a3-0f0c-6c3b9522f8ff@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:41:46 +0000
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>,
Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"open list:SYNC FILE FRAMEWORK" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/14] dma-buf/sync_file: Support (E)POLLPRI
On 24/02/2023 09:26, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:51:48 -0800
> Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1:38 AM Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 07:37:26 -0800
>>> Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 1:49 AM Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>>> On another matter, if the application uses SET_DEADLINE with one
>>>>> timestamp, and the compositor uses SET_DEADLINE on the same thing with
>>>>> another timestamp, what should happen?
>>>>
>>>> The expectation is that many deadline hints can be set on a fence.
>>>> The fence signaller should track the soonest deadline.
>>>
>>> You need to document that as UAPI, since it is observable to userspace.
>>> It would be bad if drivers or subsystems would differ in behaviour.
>>>
>>
>> It is in the end a hint. It is about giving the driver more
>> information so that it can make better choices. But the driver is
>> even free to ignore it. So maybe "expectation" is too strong of a
>> word. Rather, any other behavior doesn't really make sense. But it
>> could end up being dictated by how the hw and/or fw works.
>
> It will stop being a hint once it has been implemented and used in the
> wild long enough. The kernel userspace regression rules make sure of
> that.
Yeah, tricky and maybe a gray area in this case. I think we eluded
elsewhere in the thread that renaming the thing might be an option.
So maybe instead of deadline, which is a very strong word, use something
along the lines of "present time hint", or "signalled time hint"? Maybe
reads clumsy. Just throwing some ideas for a start.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> See the topic of implementing triple-buffering in Mutter in order to
> put more work to the GPU in order to have the GPU ramp up clocks in
> order to not miss rendering deadlines. I don't think that patch set has
> landed in Mutter upstream, but I hear distributions in downstream are
> already carrying it.
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1383
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1441
>
> Granted, GPU clocks are just one side of that story it seems, and
> triple-buffering may have other benefits.
>
> If SET_DEADLINE would fix that problem without triple-buffering, it is
> definitely userspace observable, expected and eventually required
> behaviour.
>
>
> Thanks,
> pq
Powered by blists - more mailing lists