linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tools/io_uring] tools/io_uring: correctly set "ret" for sq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2023 10:25:38 +0800
From:   Ziyang Zhang <ZiyangZhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        asml.silence@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tools/io_uring] tools/io_uring: correctly set "ret" for
 sq_poll case

On 2023/2/23 11:46, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/21/23 12:37?AM, Ziyang Zhang wrote:
>> For sq_poll case, "ret" is not initialized or cleared/set. In this way,
>> output of this test program is incorrect and we can not even stop this
>> program by pressing CTRL-C.
>>
>> Reset "ret" to zero in each submission/completion round, and assign
>> "ret" to "this_reap".
> 
> Can you check if this issue also exists in the fio copy of this, which
> is t/io_uring.c in:
> 
> git://git.kernel.dk/fio
> 
> The copy in the kernel is pretty outdated at this point, and should
> probably get removed. But if the bug is in the above main version, then
> we should fix it there and then ponder if we want to remove the one in
> the kernel or just get it updated to match the upstream version.
> 

Hi Jens,

I have checked t/io_uring.c and the code is correct with sq_poll.

Regards,
Zhang