| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 18:06:22 +0530
From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 18/21] RISC-V: Add ACPI initialization in setup_arch()
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 09:07:43PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:50:40PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > Initialize the ACPI core for RISC-V during boot.
> >
> > ACPI tables and interpreter are initialized based on
> > the information passed from the firmware and the value of
> > the kernel parameter 'acpi'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 25 ++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> > index 13b26c87c136..35e7b24a30c8 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/efi.h>
> >
> > int acpi_noirq = 1; /* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */
> > int acpi_disabled = 1;
> > @@ -26,6 +27,118 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled);
> >
> > static unsigned int intc_count;
> > static struct acpi_madt_rintc cpu_madt_rintc[NR_CPUS];
> > +static bool param_acpi_off __initdata;
> > +static bool param_acpi_on __initdata;
> > +static bool param_acpi_force __initdata;
> > +
> > +static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
> > +{
> > + if (!arg)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /* "acpi=off" disables both ACPI table parsing and interpreter */
> > + if (strcmp(arg, "off") == 0)
> > + param_acpi_off = true;
> > + else if (strcmp(arg, "on") == 0) /* prefer ACPI over DT */
> > + param_acpi_on = true;
> > + else if (strcmp(arg, "force") == 0) /* force ACPI to be enabled */
> > + param_acpi_force = true;
> > + else
> > + return -EINVAL; /* Core will print when we return error */
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +early_param("acpi", parse_acpi);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * acpi_fadt_sanity_check() - Check FADT presence and carry out sanity
> > + * checks on it
> > + *
> > + * Return 0 on success, <0 on failure
> > + */
> > +static int __init acpi_fadt_sanity_check(void)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_table_header *table;
> > + struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt;
> > + acpi_status status;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * FADT is required on riscv; retrieve it to check its presence
> > + * and carry out revision and ACPI HW reduced compliancy tests
> > + */
> > + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_FADT, 0, &table);
> > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > + const char *msg = acpi_format_exception(status);
> > +
> > + pr_err("Failed to get FADT table, %s\n", msg);
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
> > +
> > + if (!(fadt->flags & ACPI_FADT_HW_REDUCED)) {
>
> Do we also need to check for ACPI version 5.0+ when checking for HW
> reduced?
>
We need to add version check of FADT once spec is released. Will
update it at that time.
> > + pr_err("FADT not ACPI hardware reduced compliant\n");
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * acpi_get_table() creates FADT table mapping that
> > + * should be released after parsing and before resuming boot
> > + */
> > + acpi_put_table(table);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * acpi_boot_table_init() called from setup_arch(), always.
> > + * 1. find RSDP and get its address, and then find XSDT
> > + * 2. extract all tables and checksums them all
> > + * 3. check ACPI FADT HW reduced flag
> > + *
> > + * We can parse ACPI boot-time tables such as MADT after
> > + * this function is called.
> > + *
> > + * On return ACPI is enabled if either:
> > + *
> > + * - ACPI tables are initialized and sanity checks passed
> > + * - acpi=force was passed in the command line and ACPI was not disabled
> > + * explicitly through acpi=off command line parameter
> > + *
> > + * ACPI is disabled on function return otherwise
> > + */
> > +void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless
> > + * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or
> > + * - firmware has not populated ACPI ptr in EFI system table
> > + * and ACPI has not been [force] enabled (acpi=on|force)
> > + */
> > + if (param_acpi_off ||
> > + (!param_acpi_on && !param_acpi_force &&
> > + efi.acpi20 == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * ACPI is disabled at this point. Enable it in order to parse
> > + * the ACPI tables and carry out sanity checks
> > + */
> > + enable_acpi();
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If ACPI tables are initialized and FADT sanity checks passed,
> > + * leave ACPI enabled and carry on booting; otherwise disable ACPI
> > + * on initialization error.
> > + * If acpi=force was passed on the command line it forces ACPI
> > + * to be enabled even if its initialization failed.
> > + */
> > + if (acpi_table_init() || acpi_fadt_sanity_check()) {
> > + pr_err("Failed to init ACPI tables\n");
> > + if (!param_acpi_force)
> > + disable_acpi();
> > + }
> > +}
>
> A lot of the above code is common with arm64. It'd be nice to share that,
> but maybe refactoring can be done on top of this.
>
Okay.
> >
> > static int acpi_parse_madt_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end)
> > {
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > index 4335f08ffaf2..c2ee7f4427a1 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> > * Nick Kossifidis <mick@....forth.gr>
> > */
> >
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > #include <linux/memblock.h>
> > @@ -276,14 +277,22 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> >
> > efi_init();
> > paging_init();
> > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB)
> > - unflatten_and_copy_device_tree();
> > -#else
> > - if (early_init_dt_verify(__va(XIP_FIXUP(dtb_early_pa))))
> > - unflatten_device_tree();
> > - else
> > - pr_err("No DTB found in kernel mappings\n");
> > -#endif
> > +
> > + /* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration */
> > + acpi_boot_table_init();
> > + if (acpi_disabled) {
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB)) {
> > + unflatten_and_copy_device_tree();
> > + } else {
> > + if (early_init_dt_verify(__va(XIP_FIXUP(dtb_early_pa))))
> > + unflatten_device_tree();
> > + else
> > + pr_err("No DTB found in kernel mappings\n");
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + early_init_dt_verify(__va(XIP_FIXUP(dtb_early_pa)));
> > + }
> > +
> > early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
> > misc_mem_init();
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Thanks,
Sunil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists