linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/16] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8192-asurada: Couple VGPU and VSRAM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7a4653f6-c074-1bd7-718a-7754f56c5105@collabora.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2023 14:05:24 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc:     matthias.bgg@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/16] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8192-asurada: Couple
 VGPU and VSRAM_OTHER regulators

Il 24/02/23 10:58, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:44 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add coupling for these regulators, as VSRAM_OTHER is used to power the
>> GPU SRAM, and they have a strict voltage output relation to satisfy in
>> order to ensure GPU stable operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
>> index df477eb89f21..c8b6e1a9605b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
>> @@ -447,6 +447,13 @@ &mt6359_vrf12_ldo_reg {
>>          regulator-always-on;
>>   };
>>
>> +&mt6359_vsram_others_ldo_reg {
>> +       regulator-min-microvolt = <750000>;
>> +       regulator-max-microvolt = <850000>;
>> +       regulator-coupled-with = <&mt6315_7_vbuck1>;
>> +       regulator-coupled-max-spread = <10000>;
>> +};
>> +
>>   &mt6359_vufs_ldo_reg {
>>          regulator-always-on;
>>   };
>> @@ -1411,6 +1418,8 @@ mt6315_7_vbuck1: vbuck1 {
>>                                  regulator-max-microvolt = <1193750>;
>>                                  regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <256>;
>>                                  regulator-allowed-modes = <0 1 2>;
>> +                               regulator-coupled-with = <&mt6359_vsram_others_ldo_reg>;
>> +                               regulator-coupled-max-spread = <10000>;
> 
> Also fix the constraints here? And overriding the constraints should be
> mentioned in the commit log.
> 

There's no constraint to fix, though. The current ones are just fine.

I'll mention the constraints override for vsram_others in v3!

Regards,
Angelo

>>                          };
>>                  };
>>          };
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>