[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/jdDeBPM//W5WG8@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:51:41 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>
Cc: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"peterhuewe@....de" <peterhuewe@....de>,
"jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V3 1/3] tpm_tis-spi: Support hardware wait polling
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:16:27PM +0000, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote:
> > > > > + spi_bus_lock(phy->spi_device->master);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + while (len) {
> > > > Why?
> > > TPM supports max 64B in single transaction. Loop to send rest of it.
> > No, why is there a bus lock?
> Bus lock to avoid other clients to be accessed between TPM transfers.
That's what a bus lock does but what would be the problem if something
else sent a message between messages? Note that a message will always
be sent atomically.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists