[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CH2PR12MB389570356FFCCE60DE13AB4FD7A89@CH2PR12MB3895.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 15:59:32 +0000
From: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] gpio: gpio-mlxbf3: Add gpio driver support
> > > > Gpiochip_add_data_with_keys only reads the ngpios property if
> > > > (ngpios == 0) which is not the case when bgpio_init is called. bgpio_init
> uses "sz"
> > > argument to populate the ngpio in bgpio_init, which is not what we want.
> > >
> > > Maybe bgpio_init() is not a good API for your case?
> >
> > At the moment, bgpio_init handles all the direction in/out get/set gpio value
> for us.
> > So I can either remove bgpio_init so that we get the correct ngpios
> property, but will have to define get_gpio, set_gpio, dir in and dir out.
> > Or I can keep bgpio_init and device_property_read_u32 in the gpio-
> mlxbf3.c driver.
>
> So far it seems the issue is in bgpio_init() that doesn't handle ngpios properly.
> Maybe we need to fix this first?
Ok I will send a sperate patch shortly addressing this.
> Btw, have you considered using the gpio-regmap approach?
Thanks! I see examples of drivers already using this (gpio-tn48m.c). Will take a look.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists