linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] ptrace,syscall_user_dispatch: checkpoint/restore support for SUD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y/jfsiFBF7RYoMvN@memverge.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2023 11:02:58 -0500
From:   Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>
To:     Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
Cc:     Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org,
        krisman@...labora.com, tglx@...utronix.de, corbet@....net,
        shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] ptrace,syscall_user_dispatch: checkpoint/restore
 support for SUD

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:17:56AM -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> 
> You need to verify all patches with ./scripts/checkpatch.pl. Here are
> a few other warnings.
>

I completely neglected this, aye aye

> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/get_set_sud.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/get_set_sud.c
> 
> I think the test has to be in a separate patch.
> 

will split

> > +       if (ret < 0) {
> > +               ASSERT_EQ(errno, EIO);
> 
> When do we expect to get EIO here?
> 

artifact from an old version i never dropped, had to do with my include
paths being messed up and not being able to include linux/ptrace.h for
some reason.  Will drop

~Gregory