[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4cdae93-a003-d07f-3074-3542a231747b@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:15:10 -0600
From: Alex Elder <alex.elder@...aro.org>
To: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Prakruthi Deepak Heragu <quic_pheragu@...cinc.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Murali Nalajala <quic_mnalajal@...cinc.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <quic_svaddagi@...cinc.com>,
Carl van Schaik <quic_cvanscha@...cinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/26] virt: gunyah: msgq: Add hypercalls to send and
receive messages
On 2/14/23 3:23 PM, Elliot Berman wrote:
> Add hypercalls to send and receive messages on a Gunyah message queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/gunyah/gunyah_hypercall.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/gunyah.h | 7 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/gunyah/gunyah_hypercall.c b/arch/arm64/gunyah/gunyah_hypercall.c
> index f30d06ee80cf..2ca9ab098ff6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/gunyah/gunyah_hypercall.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/gunyah/gunyah_hypercall.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_is_gunyah_guest);
> fn)
>
> #define GH_HYPERCALL_HYP_IDENTIFY GH_HYPERCALL(0x8000)
> +#define GH_HYPERCALL_MSGQ_SEND GH_HYPERCALL(0x801B)
> +#define GH_HYPERCALL_MSGQ_RECV GH_HYPERCALL(0x801C)
>
> /**
> * gh_hypercall_hyp_identify() - Returns build information and feature flags
> @@ -57,5 +59,35 @@ void gh_hypercall_hyp_identify(struct gh_hypercall_hyp_identify_resp *hyp_identi
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_hypercall_hyp_identify);
>
> +enum gh_error gh_hypercall_msgq_send(u64 capid, size_t size, uintptr_t buff, int tx_flags,
> + bool *ready)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(GH_HYPERCALL_MSGQ_SEND, capid, size, buff, tx_flags, 0, &res);
> +
> + if (res.a0 == GH_ERROR_OK)
> + *ready = res.a1;
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_hypercall_msgq_send);
> +
> +enum gh_error gh_hypercall_msgq_recv(u64 capid, uintptr_t buff, size_t size, size_t *recv_size,
> + bool *ready)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(GH_HYPERCALL_MSGQ_RECV, capid, buff, size, 0, &res);
> +
> + if (res.a0 == GH_ERROR_OK) {
> + *recv_size = res.a1;
Is there any chance the 64-bit size is incompatible
with size_t? (Too big?)
> + *ready = res.a2;
*ready = !!res.a2;
> + }
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_hypercall_msgq_recv);
> +
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Gunyah Hypervisor Hypercalls");
> diff --git a/include/linux/gunyah.h b/include/linux/gunyah.h
> index 3fef2854c5e1..cb6df4eec5c2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gunyah.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gunyah.h
> @@ -112,4 +112,11 @@ struct gh_hypercall_hyp_identify_resp {
>
> void gh_hypercall_hyp_identify(struct gh_hypercall_hyp_identify_resp *hyp_identity);
>
> +#define GH_HYPERCALL_MSGQ_TX_FLAGS_PUSH BIT(0)
> +
> +enum gh_error gh_hypercall_msgq_send(u64 capid, size_t size, uintptr_t buff, int tx_flags,
> + bool *ready);
Why uintptr_t? Why not just pass a host pointer (void *)
and do whatever conversion is necessary inside the function?
-Alex
> +enum gh_error gh_hypercall_msgq_recv(u64 capid, uintptr_t buff, size_t size, size_t *recv_size,
> + bool *ready);
> +
> #endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists