[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230224031232.mivsss3ofifbagsb@offworld>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 19:12:32 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Add raw_spinlock* torture tests for
PREEMPT_RT kernels
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, Zqiang wrote:
>In PREEMPT_RT kernels, both spin_lock() and spin_lock_irq() are converted
>to sleepable rt_spin_lock(). This means that the interrupt related suffix
>for spin_lock/unlock(_irq, irqsave/irqrestore) do not affect the CPU's
>interrupt state. This commit therefore adds raw spin-lock torture tests.
>This in turn permits pure spin locks to be tested in PREEMPT_RT kernels.
>
>Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
>Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists