[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230225221405.62e989c8.gary@garyguo.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 22:14:05 +0000
From: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
To: Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>,
Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] rust: error: Add Error::to_ptr()
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 17:50:19 +0900
Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net> wrote:
> This is the Rust equivalent to ERR_PTR(), for use in C callbacks.
> Marked as #[allow(dead_code)] for now, since it does not have any
> consumers yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
> ---
> rust/helpers.c | 7 +++++++
> rust/kernel/error.rs | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/helpers.c b/rust/helpers.c
> index 09a4d93f9d62..89f4cd1e0df3 100644
> --- a/rust/helpers.c
> +++ b/rust/helpers.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/bug.h>
> #include <linux/build_bug.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/refcount.h>
>
> __noreturn void rust_helper_BUG(void)
> @@ -46,6 +47,12 @@ bool rust_helper_refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rust_helper_refcount_dec_and_test);
>
> +__force void *rust_helper_ERR_PTR(long err)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rust_helper_ERR_PTR);
> +
I know that we already have `IS_ERR` in helpers.c, but having to go
through FFI and helper functions for something as simple as a cast
feels awkward to me.
Given that `ERR_PTR`'s C definition is very unlike to change, would it
be problematic if we just reimplement it in Rust as
```rust
fn ERR_PTR(error: core::ffi::c_long) -> *mut core::ffi::c_void {
error as _
// Or `core::ptr::invalid(error as _)` with strict provenance
}
```
?
I personally think it should be fine, but I'll leave the decision to
Miguel.
Best,
Gary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists