[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230224180443.1247077f0047c70451e7fc97@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 18:04:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>,
"Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" <brauner@...nel.org>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mm tree with Linus' tree
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:39:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the mm tree got a conflict in:
>
> mm/shmem.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 7a80e5b8c6fa ("shmem: support idmapped mounts for tmpfs")
mm/shmem.c is under, umm, mm/.
Said patch was not made available to the linux-mm subscribers or to the
shmem.c developers. It doesn't have a Link: tag and doesn't appear to
have been cc:linux-kernel and a google search for the title doesn't tell
me much.
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 9323c8b93d95 ("mm: shmem: implement POSIX_FADV_[WILL|DONT]NEED for shmem")
>
> from the mm tree.
"mm-unstable tree", thankfully.
Is OK thanks, I'll fix this up when I resync with upstream.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists