[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230225204239.21f1e1ab9c9523f803d9624c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 20:42:39 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...a.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmapool: push new blocks in ascending order
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:54:00 -0800 Keith Busch <kbusch@...a.com> wrote:
> Some users of the dmapool need their allocations to happen in ascending
> order. The recent optimizations pushed the blocks in reverse order, so
> restore the previous behavior by linking the next available block from
> low-to-high.
As I understand it, this fixes the only known issues with patch series
"dmapool enhancements", v4. So we're good for a merge before 6.3-rc1,
yes?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists