linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.2 04/53] rcu: Make RCU_LOCKDEP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230226144446.824580-4-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 26 Feb 2023 09:43:56 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, frederic@...nel.org,
        quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.2 04/53] rcu: Make RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() avoid early lockdep checks

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit 0cae5ded535c3a80aed94f119bbd4ee3ae284a65 ]

Currently, RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() checks the condition before checking
to see if lockdep is still enabled.  This is necessary to avoid the
false-positive splats fixed by commit 3066820034b5dd ("rcu: Reject
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() false positives").  However, the current state can
result in false-positive splats during early boot before lockdep is fully
initialized.  This commit therefore checks debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled()
both before and after checking the condition, thus avoiding both sets
of false-positive error reports.

Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Reported-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 03abf883a281b..aa86de01aab6d 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -374,11 +374,18 @@ static inline int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void)
  * RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN - emit lockdep splat if specified condition is met
  * @c: condition to check
  * @s: informative message
+ *
+ * This checks debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() before checking (c) to
+ * prevent early boot splats due to lockdep not yet being initialized,
+ * and rechecks it after checking (c) to prevent false-positive splats
+ * due to races with lockdep being disabled.  See commit 3066820034b5dd
+ * ("rcu: Reject RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() false positives") for more detail.
  */
 #define RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(c, s)						\
 	do {								\
 		static bool __section(".data.unlikely") __warned;	\
-		if ((c) && debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !__warned) {	\
+		if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && (c) &&		\
+		    debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !__warned) {		\
 			__warned = true;				\
 			lockdep_rcu_suspicious(__FILE__, __LINE__, s);	\
 		}							\
-- 
2.39.0