[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230226165321.24825-2-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 23:53:20 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] workqueue: Simplify a pr_warn() call in wq_select_unbound_cpu()
Use pr_warn_once() to achieve the same thing. It's simpler.
Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b8b541caed4854a4..3f1fabea000f4408 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1392,15 +1392,13 @@ static bool is_chained_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
*/
static int wq_select_unbound_cpu(int cpu)
{
- static bool printed_dbg_warning;
int new_cpu;
if (likely(!wq_debug_force_rr_cpu)) {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, wq_unbound_cpumask))
return cpu;
- } else if (!printed_dbg_warning) {
- pr_warn("workqueue: round-robin CPU selection forced, expect performance impact\n");
- printed_dbg_warning = true;
+ } else {
+ pr_warn_once("workqueue: round-robin CPU selection forced, expect performance impact\n");
}
if (cpumask_empty(wq_unbound_cpumask))
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists