[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230226135734.6ba10ed872bc14802937c7ea@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 13:57:34 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Taejoon Song <taejoon.song@....com>
Cc: sjenning@...hat.com, ddstreet@...e.org, vitaly.wool@...sulko.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yjay.kim@....com,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: try to avoid worst-case scenario on same
element pages
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 04:00:36 +0900 Taejoon Song <taejoon.song@....com> wrote:
> The worst-case scenario on finding same element pages is that almost all
> elements are same at the first glance but only last few elements are
> different.
>
> Since the same element tends to be grouped from the beginning of the
> pages, if we check the first element with the last element before
> looping through all elements, we might have some chances to quickly
> detect non-same element pages.
>
> 1. Test is done under LG webOS TV (64-bit arch)
> 2. Dump the swap-out pages (~819200 pages)
> 3. Analyze the pages with simple test script which counts the iteration
> number and measures the speed at off-line
>
> Under 64-bit arch, the worst iteration count is PAGE_SIZE / 8 bytes =
> 512. The speed is based on the time to consume page_same_filled()
> function only. The result, on average, is listed as below:
>
> Num of Iter Speed(MB/s)
> Looping-Forward (Orig) 38 99265
> Looping-Backward 36 102725
> Last-element-check (This Patch) 33 125072
>
> The result shows that the average iteration count decreases by 13% and
> the speed increases by 25% with this patch. This patch does not
> increase the overall time complexity, though.
>
> I also ran simpler version which uses backward loop. Just looping
> backward also makes some improvement, but less than this patch.
Seems a nice change.
> This patch was already applied to zram on mainline v5.6-rc1:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/3/1422
I redid this a little:
A similar change has already been made to zram in 90f82cbfe502 ("zram: try
to avoid worst-case scenario on same element pages").
> ...
> --- a/mm/zswap.c
> +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> @@ -1073,15 +1073,23 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zpool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>
> static int zswap_is_page_same_filled(void *ptr, unsigned long *value)
> {
> - unsigned int pos;
> unsigned long *page;
> + unsigned long val;
> + unsigned int pos, last_pos = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(*page) - 1;
>
> page = (unsigned long *)ptr;
> - for (pos = 1; pos < PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(*page); pos++) {
> - if (page[pos] != page[0])
> + val = page[0];
> +
> + if (val != page[last_pos])
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (pos = 1; pos < last_pos; pos++) {
> + if (val != page[pos])
> return 0;
> }
> - *value = page[0];
> +
> + *value = val;
> +
> return 1;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists