lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87356r117t.fsf@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:12:54 +0200
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To:     Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
        Yaroslav Bolyukin <iam@...h.pw>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
        Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        "Liu, Wenjing" <Wenjing.Liu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/edid: parse DRM VESA dsc bpp target

On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com> wrote:
> On 2/26/23 09:10, Yaroslav Bolyukin wrote:
>> As per DisplayID v2.0 Errata E9 spec "DSC pass-through timing support"
>> VESA vendor-specific data block may contain target DSC bits per pixel
>> fields
>> 
>
> According to the errata this should only apply to VII timings. The way
> it is currently implemented will make it apply to everything which is
> not what we want.
>
> Can we add this field to drm_mode_info instead of drm_display_info and
> set it inside drm_mode_displayid_detailed when parsing a type_7 timing?

That's actually difficult to do nicely. I think the patch at hand is
fine, and it's fine to add the information to drm_display_info. It's a
dependency to parsing the modes.

How the info will actually be used is a different matter, and obviously
needs to follow the spec. As it is, *this* patch doesn't say anything
about that. But whether it's handled in VII timings parsing or
elsewhere, I still think this part is fine.


BR,
Jani.

>
> Harry
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yaroslav Bolyukin <iam@...h.pw>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c  | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>  include/drm/drm_connector.h |  6 ++++++
>>  include/drm/drm_displayid.h |  4 ++++
>>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>> index 3d0a4da661bc..aa88ac82cbe0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>> @@ -6338,7 +6338,7 @@ static void drm_parse_vesa_mso_data(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  	if (oui(vesa->oui[0], vesa->oui[1], vesa->oui[2]) != VESA_IEEE_OUI)
>>  		return;
>>  
>> -	if (sizeof(*vesa) != sizeof(*block) + block->num_bytes) {
>> +	if (block->num_bytes < 5) {
>>  		drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev,
>>  			    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Unexpected VESA vendor block size\n",
>>  			    connector->base.id, connector->name);
>> @@ -6361,24 +6361,37 @@ static void drm_parse_vesa_mso_data(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  		break;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (!info->mso_stream_count) {
>> -		info->mso_pixel_overlap = 0;
>> -		return;
>> -	}
>> +	info->mso_pixel_overlap = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (info->mso_stream_count) {
>> +		info->mso_pixel_overlap = FIELD_GET(DISPLAYID_VESA_MSO_OVERLAP, vesa->mso);
>> +
>> +		if (info->mso_pixel_overlap > 8) {
>> +			drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev,
>> +				    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Reserved MSO pixel overlap value %u\n",
>> +				    connector->base.id, connector->name,
>> +				    info->mso_pixel_overlap);
>> +			info->mso_pixel_overlap = 8;
>> +		}
>>  
>> -	info->mso_pixel_overlap = FIELD_GET(DISPLAYID_VESA_MSO_OVERLAP, vesa->mso);
>> -	if (info->mso_pixel_overlap > 8) {
>>  		drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev,
>> -			    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Reserved MSO pixel overlap value %u\n",
>> +			    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] MSO stream count %u, pixel overlap %u\n",
>>  			    connector->base.id, connector->name,
>> -			    info->mso_pixel_overlap);
>> -		info->mso_pixel_overlap = 8;
>> +			    info->mso_stream_count, info->mso_pixel_overlap);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (block->num_bytes < 7) {
>> +		/* DSC bpp is optional */
>> +		return;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	info->dp_dsc_bpp = FIELD_GET(DISPLAYID_VESA_DSC_BPP_INT, vesa->dsc_bpp_int) * 16
>> +		+ FIELD_GET(DISPLAYID_VESA_DSC_BPP_FRACT, vesa->dsc_bpp_fract);
>> +
>>  	drm_dbg_kms(connector->dev,
>> -		    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] MSO stream count %u, pixel overlap %u\n",
>> +		    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] DSC bits per pixel %u\n",
>>  		    connector->base.id, connector->name,
>> -		    info->mso_stream_count, info->mso_pixel_overlap);
>> +		    info->dp_dsc_bpp);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void drm_update_mso(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> @@ -6425,6 +6438,7 @@ static void drm_reset_display_info(struct drm_connector *connector)
>>  	info->mso_stream_count = 0;
>>  	info->mso_pixel_overlap = 0;
>>  	info->max_dsc_bpp = 0;
>> +	info->dp_dsc_bpp = 0;
>>  
>>  	kfree(info->vics);
>>  	info->vics = NULL;
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_connector.h b/include/drm/drm_connector.h
>> index 7b5048516185..1d01e0146a7f 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_connector.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_connector.h
>> @@ -719,6 +719,12 @@ struct drm_display_info {
>>  	 */
>>  	u32 max_dsc_bpp;
>>  
>> +	/**
>> +	 * @dp_dsc_bpp: DP Display-Stream-Compression (DSC) timing's target
>> +	 * DST bits per pixel in 6.4 fixed point format. 0 means undefined
>> +	 */
>> +	u16 dp_dsc_bpp;
>> +
>>  	/**
>>  	 * @vics: Array of vics_len VICs. Internal to EDID parsing.
>>  	 */
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
>> index 49649eb8447e..0fc3afbd1675 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_displayid.h
>> @@ -131,12 +131,16 @@ struct displayid_detailed_timing_block {
>>  
>>  #define DISPLAYID_VESA_MSO_OVERLAP	GENMASK(3, 0)
>>  #define DISPLAYID_VESA_MSO_MODE		GENMASK(6, 5)
>> +#define DISPLAYID_VESA_DSC_BPP_INT	GENMASK(5, 0)
>> +#define DISPLAYID_VESA_DSC_BPP_FRACT	GENMASK(3, 0)
>>  
>>  struct displayid_vesa_vendor_specific_block {
>>  	struct displayid_block base;
>>  	u8 oui[3];
>>  	u8 data_structure_type;
>>  	u8 mso;
>> +	u8 dsc_bpp_int;
>> +	u8 dsc_bpp_fract;
>>  } __packed;
>>  
>>  /* DisplayID iteration */
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ