[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44e67d88-fce6-a1c1-79a9-a937e64a32bb@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 20:57:04 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Ryan Neph <ryanneph@...omium.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
"open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/virtio: Add option to disable KMS support
On 2/27/23 20:38, Rob Clark wrote:
...
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_VIRTIO_GPU_KMS)) {
> + /* get display info */
> + virtio_cread_le(vgdev->vdev, struct virtio_gpu_config,
> + num_scanouts, &num_scanouts);
> + vgdev->num_scanouts = min_t(uint32_t, num_scanouts,
> + VIRTIO_GPU_MAX_SCANOUTS);
> + if (!vgdev->num_scanouts) {
> + /*
> + * Having an EDID but no scanouts is non-sensical,
> + * but it is permitted to have no scanouts and no
> + * EDID (in which case DRIVER_MODESET and
> + * DRIVER_ATOMIC are not advertised)
> + */
> + if (vgdev->has_edid) {
> + DRM_ERROR("num_scanouts is zero\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_scanouts;
> + }
> + dev->driver_features &= ~(DRIVER_MODESET | DRIVER_ATOMIC);
If it's now configurable by host, why do we need the
CONFIG_DRM_VIRTIO_GPU_KMS?
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists