linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra210-quad: Fix iterator outside loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y/z1Eu3DUaU/Dbfh@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 18:23:14 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>
Cc:     "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra210-quad: Fix iterator outside loop

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:36:18AM +0000, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote:

> > > > > -	if (!xfer->cs_change) {
> > > > > -		tegra_qspi_transfer_end(spi);
> > > > > -		spi_transfer_delay_exec(xfer);
> > > > > -	}
> > updating the length of the message.
> > > > This looks like it'll do the wrong thing and do a change on every
> > > > transfer if cs_change isn't set?

> > > This condition is hit only in data phase which is end of message.

> > Shouldn't this just be moved into the DATA_TRANSFER case statement?
> Calling transfer_end after updating message length.

Something seems to be mangled with your quoting/new text here so it's a
bit unclear what you're saying here but if you're saying that this is
due to needing to call tegra_qspi_transfer_end() after updating the
length I'm not sure why - AFAICT that function doesn't reference the
transfer length at all, it just writes out a command to configure the
chip select?  There's no issue with the message being finalised since
that happens in the caller.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)