[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4c440ef-e0ec-ea07-71b2-3fd3c4d52088@igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:43:16 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: drv@...lo.com, ssengar@...rosoft.com,
kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>, Liang He <windhl@....com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: bcm: brcmstb: Remove bare-metal ARM suspend/resume
code
On 27/02/2023 15:38, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> [...]
>>> -static int brcmstb_pm_panic_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>> - unsigned long action, void *data)
>>> -{
>>> - writel_relaxed(BRCMSTB_PANIC_MAGIC, ctrl.aon_sram + AON_REG_PANIC);
>>> -
>>> - return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>> [...]
>>
>> Hi Florian, thanks for the clean-up!
>>
>> I'm curious with the above panic notifier - is it not necessary when
>> PSCI is used?
>
> This is a bit of long story, but no, it is not necessary.
OK then heh
Glad for the clean-up!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists