linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] drm/msm/disp/dpu: fix sc7280

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE-0n51tvrbr1f2cRz4pCE-LMPjn09wXTAuiB9D_QeiF65pHVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:58:32 -0500
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        airlied@...il.com, andersson@...nel.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
        dianders@...omium.org, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, robdclark@...il.com,
        sean@...rly.run, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc:     quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/msm/disp/dpu: fix sc7280_pp base address

Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2023-02-27 09:04:31)
> Correct sc7280 pp block base address.

What goes wrong if this is left unchanged? How important is it to fix
this? Does the display fail to work? Does it fix something for a new
feature that isn't yet enabled upstream?

This information is useful to put in the commit text so we know the
severity of the problem that is being fixed and so that maintainers can
understand the importance of the patch.

>
> Fixes: 591e34a091d1 ("drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add support for display for SC7280 target")
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>