[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5de30963-9be9-4e87-a696-7a642d92630f@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:04:04 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...hat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@....de>, "Matt Turner" <mattst88@...il.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>, x86@...nel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] char/agp: consolidate asm/agp.h
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023, at 09:46, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>
> asm/agp.h is duplicated in several architectures, with x86 being the
> only instance that differs from the rest.
>
> Introduce asm-generic/agp.h and use it instead of per-architecture
> headers for the most cases.
>
> I believe that asm-generic is the best tree to pick up this patches.
>
> Mike Rapoport (IBM) (2): char/agp: consolidate
> {alloc,free}_gatt_pages() char/agp: introduce asm-generic/agp.h
Hi Mike,
It looks like I wrote an email saying I merged these two patches,
but never actually sent it out. Not sure if you found out another
way, but this was part of the asm-generic tree for 6.3 and is now
merged upstream.
Thanks for the cleanup,
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists