[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <846439be-77db-7311-3bb3-3647dc6d0622@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 12:05:53 -0800
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<airlied@...il.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<dianders@...omium.org>, <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
<robdclark@...il.com>, <sean@...rly.run>, <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dp: check core_initialized flag at both
host_init() and host_deinit()
Hi Stephen
On 2/27/2023 11:53 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2023-02-24 10:29:58)
>> There is a reboot/suspend test case where system suspend is forced during
>> system booting up. Since host_init() of external DP is executed at hpd
>
> dp_display_host_init()?
>
>> thread context, this test case may created a scenario that host_deinit()
>
> dp_display_host_deinit()?
>
ack for both.
>> from pm_suspend() run before host_init() if hpd thread has no chance to
>> run during booting up while suspend request command was issued.
>> At this scenario system will crash at aux register access at host_deinit()
>> since aux clock had not yet been enabled by host_init(). Therefore we
>
> The aux clk is enabled in dp_power_clk_enable() right? Can you clarify?
>
Yes, thats right. Its mapped to core_*** in the dts hence the name goes
to the DP_CORE_PM case in the dp_power_clk_enable()
3092 clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
3093 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DP_AUX_CLK>,
3094 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DP_LINK_CLK>,
3095 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DP_LINK_INTF_CLK>,
3096 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DP_PIXEL_CLK>;
3097 clock-names = "core_iface", "core_aux"
>> have to ensure aux clock enabled by checking core_initialized flag before
>> access aux registers at pm_suspend.
>
> I'd much more like to get rid of 'core_initialized'. What is preventing
> us from enabling the power (i.e. dp_power_init()), or at least enough
> clks and pm runtime state, during probe? That would fix this problem and
> also clean things up. As I understand, the device is half initialized in
> probe and half initialized in the kthread. If we put all power
> management into the runtime PM ops and synced that state during probe so
> that runtime PM state matched device probe state we could make runtime
> PM be the only suspend function and then push the power state tracking
> into the device core.
>
You are correct. https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/523879/ will be
doing that. Its still in review.
>>
>> Fixes: 989ebe7bc446 ("drm/msm/dp: do not initialize phy until plugin interrupt received")
>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
>
> The code looks OK to me, so
>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
>
> once the commit text is cleaned up to indicate the proper function
> names.
Thanks , will fix all those.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists