lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 12:28:43 -0800
From:   Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To:     Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, <keescook@...omium.org>,
        <gustavoars@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mux: convert mux_chip->mux to flexible array

On 2/22/2023 5:42 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> The mux_chip structure size is over allocated to additionally include both
> the array of mux controllers as well as a device specific private area.
> The controllers array is then pointed to by assigning mux_chip->mux to the
> first block of extra memory, while the private area is extracted via
> mux_chip_priv() and points to the area just after the controllers.
> 
> The size of the mux_chip allocation uses direct multiplication and addition
> rather than the <linux/overflow.h> helpers. In addition, the mux_chip->mux
> struct member wastes space by having to store the pointer as part of the
> structures.
> 
> Convert struct mux_chip to use a flexible array member for the mux
> controller array. Use struct_size() and size_add() to compute the size of
> the structure while protecting against overflow.
> 
> After converting the mux pointer, notice that two 4-byte holes remain in
> the structure layout due to the alignment requirements for the dev
> sub-structure and the ops pointer.
> 
> These can be easily fixed through re-ordering the id field to the 4-byte
> hole just after the controllers member.

Looks good to me (just a driver dev, not a mux dev!). Also added
linux-i2c mailing list and a couple others for more review.

Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>

related thread (cocci script) at [1]

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230227202428.3657443-1-jacob.e.keller@intel.com/



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ