[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99993a45-acc6-176f-d846-e278f173171c@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:47:46 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Ziqi Chen <quic_ziqichen@...cinc.com>,
Po-Wen Kao <powen.kao@...iatek.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: wsd_upstream@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
stanley.chu@...iatek.com, alice.chao@...iatek.com,
naomi.chu@...iatek.com, chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com,
cc.chou@...iatek.com, eddie.huang@...iatek.com,
mason.zhang@...iatek.com, chaotian.jing@...iatek.com,
jiajie.hao@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] scsi: ufs: core: Add hwq print for debug
On 2/23/23 02:14, Ziqi Chen wrote:
> Calling registers dump function in ufshcd_print_trs() is not reasonable,
> eg.. for each aborted request, it would print out all hwq registers,
> it's not make sense.
>
> I think we should move it out of ufshcd_print_trs().
+1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists