[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/wSXlp3vTEA6eo3@debian.me>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:15:58 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Btrfs Mailing List <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Fsdevel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: btrfs: Document the influence
of wq_cpu_set to thread_pool option
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 11:26:39PM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> + Since 6.5, if *wq_cpu_set* is set, the default value will be the number of
> + online CPUs in the CPU wq_cpu_set plus 2.
> +
Why will the behavior be introduced in such future version (6.5)?
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists