lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:41:33 +0800
From:   Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC:     Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
        Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
        Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
        Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Tao Zhang <taozha@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] coresight-tpda: Add DSB dataset support

Hi Suzuki,

Currently if the dsb_esize is not set to 32 or 64, we will not set the 
DSBSIZE bit of the register here.

This design is really not good enough.

I will change this in the next version of patch to issue a warning if an 
unexpected value is obtained.

在 2/22/2023 8:46 PM, Suzuki K Poulose 写道:
> On 19/01/2023 07:41, Tao Zhang wrote:
>> Read the DSB element size from the device tree. Set the register
>> bit that controls the DSB element size of the corresponding port.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <taozha@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c | 62 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.h |  4 ++
>>   2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c 
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c
>> index 5989798..be13e08 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpda.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ static void tpda_enable_port(struct tpda_drvdata 
>> *drvdata, int port)
>>       u32 val;
>>         val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDA_Pn_CR(port));
>> +    /*
>> +     * Configure aggregator port n DSB data set element size
>> +     * Set the bit to 0 if the size is 32
>> +     * Set the bit to 1 if the size is 64
>> +     */
>> +    if (drvdata->dsb_esize[port] == 32)
>> +        val &= ~TPDA_Pn_CR_DSBSIZE;
>> +    else if (drvdata->dsb_esize[port] == 64)
>> +        val |= TPDA_Pn_CR_DSBSIZE;
>
> What are the chances of having a value other than 32 or 64 ?
> What should we do in that case ? Should the driver at least
> give out a warning at least in the unhandled case rather than
> silently reusing the existing setting ?
>
> Suzuki
>
Best,

Tao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ