linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf/x86/core: Remove repeating test expression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y/yYTY7c7L0+d+Gb@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:17:25 +0530
From:   Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
        Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/core: Remove repeating test expression

Current implementation already checks validity of the cpu_type for the
hybrid pmu two lines above. Hence there is no need to again include
it in the immediate if test evaluation.

Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 87a7f0cd77fd..89db2352deb9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -1893,7 +1893,7 @@ ssize_t events_hybrid_sysfs_show(struct device *dev,
 	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.num_hybrid_pmus; i++) {
 		if (!(x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[i].cpu_type & pmu_attr->pmu_type))
 			continue;
-		if (x86_pmu.hybrid_pmu[i].cpu_type & pmu->cpu_type) {
+		if (pmu->cpu_type) {
 			next_str = strchr(str, ';');
 			if (next_str)
 				return snprintf(page, next_str - str + 1, "%s", str);
-- 
2.34.1