[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALPaoCgnOWLdEqKtonNeq+d_Fj0yr3Y7tgwwmAHmuhL5xBhqyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:30:38 +0100
From: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, x86@...nel.org,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86/resctrl: Determine if Sub-NUMA Cluster is enabled
and initialize.
Hi Tony,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:42 PM Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
> +static __init int find_snc_ways(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long *node_caches;
> + int cpu, node, ret;
> +
> + node_caches = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_node_ids), sizeof(*node_caches), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!node_caches)
> + return 1;
> +
> + cpus_read_lock();
> + for_each_node(node) {
Someone tried this patch on a machine with a CPU-less node...
We need to check for this:
+ if (cpumask_empty(cpumask_of_node(node)))
+ continue;
> + cpu = cpumask_first(cpumask_of_node(node));
> + set_bit(get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(cpu, 3), node_caches);
> + }
> + cpus_read_unlock();
Thanks!
-Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists