[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <066e7233-e248-aad5-7db9-63d009eafa19@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:59:10 -0300
From: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>,
Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] rust: error: Add from_kernel_result!() macro
On 2/26/23 17:59, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 7:17 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> My preference to function instead of macro here is because I want to
>> avoid the extra level of abstraction and make things explict, so that
>> users and reviewers can understand the API behavior solely based on
>> Rust's types, functions and closures: they are simpler than macros, at
>> least to me ;-)
>
> There is one extra problem with the macro: `rustfmt` does not format
> the contents if called with braces (as we currently do).
>
> So when I was cleaning some things up for v8, one of the things I did
> was run manually `rustfmt` on the blocks by removing the macro
> invocation, in commit 77a1a8c952e1 ("rust: kernel: apply `rustfmt` to
> `from_kernel_result!` blocks").
>
> Having said that, it does format it when called with parenthesis
> wrapping the block, so we could do that if we end up with the macro.
Also rust-analyzer can't analyze the insides of a from_kernel_result!
block. Only thing it can do is to suggest a macro expansion. Plus, this
macro triggers a clippy lint on a redundant call on a closure. So it's a
bit annoying to work with.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists