[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230227103257.4b99b6fb@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:32:57 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>,
Sanan Hasanov <sanan.hasanov@...ghts.ucf.edu>,
paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller@...glegroups.com,
contact@...zz.com
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in
rcu_core
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 08:15:26 -0500
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> >> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
> >> RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xf/0x20
> >> Code: 89 07 49 c7 c0 08 00 00 00 4d 29 c8 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 76 ff ff ff cc cc cc cc f3 0f 1e fa eb 07 0f 00 2d e3 8a 34 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa 65
> >> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000017fe00 EFLAGS: 00000202
> >> RAX: 0000000000dfbea1 RBX: dffffc0000000000 RCX: ffffffff89b1da9c
> >> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
> >> RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff888119fb6c23
> >> R10: ffffed10233f6d84 R11: dffffc0000000000 R12: 0000000000000003
> >> R13: ffff888100833900 R14: ffffffff8e112850 R15: 0000000000000000
> >> default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0
> >> do_idle+0x361/0x440
> >> cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x20
> >> start_secondary+0x256/0x300
> >> secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xce/0xdb
> >> </TASK>
> >> Modules linked in:
> >> CR2: 0000000000000000
> >> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> >> RIP: 0010:0x0
> >> Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6.
>
> I have seen this exact signature when the processor tries to execute a function that has a NULL address. That causes IP to goto 0 and the exception. Sounds like something corrupted rcu_head (Just a guess).
[ Joel, you need to line wrap your emails ;-) ]
This looks like a call_rcu() was called on something that later got freed
or reused. That is, the bug is not with RCU but with something using RCU.
OR it could be a bug with RCU if the synchronize_rcu() ended before the
grace periods have finished.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists