[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bkldmsy0.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 21:32:55 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>, kim.phillips@....com,
brgerst@...il.com
Cc: piotrgorski@...hyos.org, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, mimoja@...oja.de, hewenliang4@...wei.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, seanjc@...gle.com, pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de,
fam.zheng@...edance.com, punit.agrawal@...edance.com,
simon.evans@...edance.com, liangma@...ngbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 06/11] x86/smpboot: Remove initial_stack on 64-bit
On Tue, Feb 28 2023 at 16:25, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 17:13 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Folks, really.
>
> Also, while those two lines *happen* to be my addition to Brian's
> commit message, I don't know if you knew that.
I knew because I read Brians patches _and_ I know your quick changelog
style by heart.
> Speak to me how you like; you know I'll still love you. But be nicer
> to Brian and Usama.
Hmm. I was not aware that 'Folks, really.' qualifies as not nice
nowadays.
>> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>>
>> Sigh, we should finally make CONFIG_SMP def_bool y ...
>
> Not today :)
Right, but it's overdue nevertheless to adjust with reality :)
>> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32)) {
>> > + initial_stack = idle->thread.sp;
>> > + } else {
>> > + smpboot_control = cpu;
>> > + }
>>
>> Please remove the pointless brackets.
>
> I pondered that, but they only get added back again in the next patch.
> It just seemed like adding pointless churn.
Fair enough.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists