[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB=BE-Svf7TMPs-eA+sVuGtYjVWfKd1Nd_AkA9im4Op7TCLW3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 20:47:48 -0800
From: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@...gle.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>,
Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] erofs: add per-cpu threads for decompression as an option
Hi all,
I completed the tests and the results are consistent with
our previous observation. We can see that removing WQ_UNBOUND
helps but the scheduling latency by using high priority per cpu
kthreads is even lower. Below is the table.
|---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
| Table | avg | med | min | max |
|---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
| Default erofs | 19323 | 19758 | 3986 | 35051 |
|---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
| !WQ_UNBOUND | 11202 | 10798 | 3493 | 19822 |
|---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
| hipri pcpu kthreads | 7182 | 7017 | 2463 | 12300 |
|---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
Thanks,
Sandeep.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists