linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: rename watchdog node from 'wdt' into 'watchdog'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMhs-H8xGjGs0-qvxb5KgQ3YZw=2=scqaY15K3ZRp50jQcncSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:51:17 +0100
From:   Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        arinc.unal@...nc9.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: rename watchdog node
 from 'wdt' into 'watchdog'

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:41 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
<tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:44:21AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Sergio Paracuellos
> > <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 4:11 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > > > > Watchdog nodes must use 'watchdog' for node name. When a 'make dtbs_check'
> > > > > is performed the following warning appears:
> > > > >
> > > > > wdt@100: $nodename:0: 'wdt@...' does not match '^watchdog(@.*|-[0-9a-f])?$'
> > > > >
> > > > > Fix this warning up properly renaming the node into 'watchdog'.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > > >
> > > > Note that we can not apply this and the next patch of the series
> > > > through the watchdog tree since it crosses a maintainer boundary.
> > >
> > > I was expecting Thomas to get these two arch/mips patches or get an
> > > Acked-by from him in order for you to apply them.
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > I think you have missed this series since you have started to apply
> > newer stuff in mips-next. Are you ok with taking or Acking patches 2
> > and 3 of this series?
>
> yes, I sort of missed it. If it's enough to take patch 2/3 I'll do that.
> If it's better to keep the series, I'm also ok with acking them.
> What's the best way forward ?

Both trees work for me. The rest of the patches of this series should
go through the watchdog tree. Guenter, what is better for you?

Thanks,
    Sergio Paracuellos

>
> Thomas.
>
> --
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]