[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7f0c568-72b7-3342-decc-784cd5f68b1a@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:38:39 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Dikshita Agarwal <dikshita@....qualcomm.com>,
Dikshita Agarwal <dikshita@...eaurora.org>,
Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@...eaurora.org>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vikash Garodia <vgarodia@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] media: venus: hfi_venus: Set
venus_sys_idle_indicator to false on V6
On 28/02/2023 15:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 28.02.2023 16:31, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 28/02/2023 15:26, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>> On 28/02/2023 15:24, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> This call does not seem to have been cast on any kernel with support
>>>> for VPU-1.0 or newer (and by extension, HFI6 and newer).
>>>
>>> We tested this on sm8250
>>>
>>> Restrict it
>>>> to V4 only, as it seems to have been enabled by mistake and causes a
>>>> hang & reboot to EDL on at least one occasion with SM6115 / AR50L
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 7ed9e0b3393c ("media: venus: hfi, vdec: v6 Add IS_V6() to existing IS_V4() if locations")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Right. This may indeed fix it for you on SM6115, could you test it on RB5 and verify the above statement ?
>>>
>>> ---
>>> bod
>>
>> For example.
>>
>> Doesn't your later patch take account of VPU h/w version ? IRIS_1, IRIS_2 etc.
>>
>> When we added for V6 here, we meant for current tested V6 hardware at that point - at least sm8250.
>>
>> Can you not differentiate sm6115 based on VPU hardware identifier ? We want to retain this logic for 8250 and then assuming your patch is correct, not do this for sm6115.
> As far as my only source of information (msm-4.19 techpack) goes, this is
> unnecessary/incorrect on 8250 as well. I doubt downstream would ship Venus
> with no/broken low-power modes..
Can you test it and make sure ?
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists