[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/4rBgumVbfvKA9X@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:25:42 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/30] arc: Implement the new page table range API
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:34:05PM -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> You need to split ARC and ARM into separate patches.
Ugh. Looks like I inadvertently squashed them together during a rebase.
c228f5b4e007 HEAD@...1}: rebase (reword): arm64: Implement the new page table ra
nge API
22744c8ae873 HEAD@...2}: rebase (fixup): arc: Implement the new page table range
API
11da1e433338 HEAD@...3}: rebase (fixup): # This is a combination of 2 commits.
d68d7ab9b184 HEAD@...4}: rebase (start): checkout next-20230225
I was trying to fixup an arm commit and looks like i squashed the arm
commit with the arc commit instead. Will fix and resend.
> Also it'd be best to drop all the VIPT aliasing bits for ARC, they are a
> needless maintenance burden.
> I can send a patch which you could carry in your tree for easier logistics.
Works for me! I don't mind if you want to drop the VIPT bits before
or after my changes; I can adapt to either. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists