lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230228165217.GA16798@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:52:40 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
Cc:     Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        avagin@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org,
        krisman@...labora.com, tglx@...utronix.de, corbet@....net,
        shuah@...nel.org, Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] ptrace,syscall_user_dispatch: checkpoint/restore
 support for SUD

On 02/27, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
>
> > +int syscall_user_dispatch_set_config(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long size,
> > +                                    void __user *data)
> > +{
> > +       int rc;
> > +       struct ptrace_sud_config cfg;
> > +
> > +       if (size != sizeof(struct ptrace_sud_config))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       if (copy_from_user(&cfg, data, sizeof(struct ptrace_sud_config)))
> > +               return -EFAULT;
>
> It seems that the tool you want here would be copy_struct_from_user(),
> which is designed for extendable syscalls.

Hmm. Why?

In this case ksize == usize, so why do we need copy_struct_from_user ?

Oleg.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ