[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230228165217.GA16798@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:52:40 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
avagin@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org,
krisman@...labora.com, tglx@...utronix.de, corbet@....net,
shuah@...nel.org, Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] ptrace,syscall_user_dispatch: checkpoint/restore
support for SUD
On 02/27, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
>
> > +int syscall_user_dispatch_set_config(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long size,
> > + void __user *data)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > + struct ptrace_sud_config cfg;
> > +
> > + if (size != sizeof(struct ptrace_sud_config))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(&cfg, data, sizeof(struct ptrace_sud_config)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
>
> It seems that the tool you want here would be copy_struct_from_user(),
> which is designed for extendable syscalls.
Hmm. Why?
In this case ksize == usize, so why do we need copy_struct_from_user ?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists